Key result
Rosuvastatin postconditioning significantly decreased myocardial infarct size compared to ischemia-reperfusion alone (28.9±3.7% vs. 52.8±4.4%, P<0.05) in a rat model.
Why the study?
Does postconditioning with rosuvastatin reduce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats?
Population
Anesthetized male rats subjected to myocardial ischemia for 30 min
Design
Preclinical
Follow-up
4 hours of reperfusion
Authors
Loading...
Rosuvastatin postconditioning may protect against experimental ischemia-reperfusion injury; leaves open translation to clinical cardioprotection.
Does postconditioning with rosuvastatin reduce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.9% vs 52.8%
p-value: p=<0.05
Rosuvastatin postconditioning reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat model, potentially through the inhibition of HMGB1 expression.
Du et al. (2013) studied Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (n=40). Rosuvastatin vs. Ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) without rosuvastatin was evaluated on Infarct size (percentage of risk area volume) (p=<0.05). Rosuvastatin postconditioning significantly decreased myocardial infarct size compared to ischemia-reperfusion alone (28.9±3.7% vs. 52.8±4.4%, P<0.05) in a rat model.