Key result
PRES carotid baroreceptor manipulation reduces electrical pain intensity during maximum activity regardless of ischemia symptoms.
Why the study?
Does baroreceptor stimulation differentially affect pain thresholds in patients with symptomatic versus silent myocardial ischaemia?
Population
19 patients with replicable myocardial ischaemia (9 symptomatic and 10 asymptomatic)
Comparison
PRES carotid baroreceptor manipulation vs Symptomatic vs asymptomatic patients; comparison…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Baroreceptor-dependent pain inhibition does not account for silent myocardial ischaemia; leaves open alternative mechanisms.
Does baroreceptor stimulation differentially affect pain thresholds in patients with symptomatic versus silent myocardial ischaemia?
Effect estimate: F=37.8
p-value: p=<0.001
Baroreceptor-dependent pain inhibition does not explain the higher ischaemic pain thresholds observed in patients with silent myocardial ischaemia.
Kardos et al. (1994) studied Symptomatic and silent myocardial ischaemia (n=19). PRES (phase related external suction) carotid baroreceptor manipulation vs. Minimum baroreceptor activity condition was evaluated on Ratings of painful electrical stimuli (F=37.8, p=<0.001). PRES carotid baroreceptor manipulation significantly reduced the perceived intensity of painful electrical stimuli during maximum baroreceptor activity compared to minimum activity (p<0.001), with no difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic myocardial ischaemia patients.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: