Key result
Membrane oxygenators prevent ~100% of fat emboli versus macrobubble oxygenators during canine cardiopulmonary bypass.
Why the study?
Does the use of a membrane oxygenator prevent embolic fat deposition compared to a macrobubble oxygenator during cardiopulmonary bypass in dogs?
Does the use of a membrane oxygenator prevent embolic fat deposition compared to a macrobubble oxygenator during cardiopulmonary bypass in dogs?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 100%
Membrane oxygenators eliminate the formation of embolic fat seen with macrobubble oxygenators during cardiopulmonary bypass, highlighting the adverse effects of direct blood-gas contact.
May reduce fat emboli in canine bypass; hypothesis-generating for human cardiopulmonary bypass applications.
Previous work has demonstrated that prolonged employment of the filming oxygenator in bypass procedures is associated with considerable deposition of embolic fat within the vascular tree of both humans and experimental animals. Mongrel dogs were subjected to 2 hours of cardiopulmonary bypass in which macrobubble and membrane oxygenators were employed. All other conditions were standardized. All animals were sacrificed shortly after restoration of normal clotting and cardiac function. Brain, lung, liver and kidney specimens were fixed for 24 hours in 10% formalin, after which frozen sections were made and stained with Sudan IV and hematoxylin. Embolic fat was found extensively in brain, liver and kidney tissue in the five animals in which the macrobubble device had been employed. The quantity of fat appeared similar to that previously noted in animals in which the filming device had been used. No fat emboli were noted in tissues obtained from the four animals exposed to the membrane oxygenator. This suggests that the direct contact of blood and gas contributes to the development of embolic fat. Submitted on June 15, 1960
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Owens et al. (1960) studied Cardiopulmonary bypass (n=9). Membrane oxygenator vs. Macrobubble oxygenator was evaluated on Embolic fat deposition in brain, liver, and kidney tissue. Use of a membrane oxygenator during cardiopulmonary bypass resulted in no fat emboli (0/4 dogs), whereas a macrobubble oxygenator caused extensive embolic fat in all exposed animals (5/5 dogs).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: