Key result
Logistic analysis of exercise variables improves CAD sensitivity in women to ~70% without losing specificity.
Why the study?
Does logistic discriminant analysis of exercise variables improve diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease in women compared to conventional analysis?
Observational (n=326)
Does logistic discriminant analysis of exercise variables improve diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease in women compared to conventional analysis?
Logistic discriminant analysis incorporating work load, heart rate, and ST60X improves the diagnostic accuracy of exercise testing for coronary artery disease in women.
May improve CAD diagnostic sensitivity in women without specificity loss; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic accuracy of the exercise electrocardiogram in women has been shown to be limited for the detection of coronary artery disease. New diagnostic methods based on computer analysis of the exercise electrocardiogram and multivariate analysis have improved the diagnostic value of exercise testing in male subjects. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the diagnostic value of exercise testing can be enhanced in women by using multivariate analysis of exercise data. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1978 and 1984, 135 infarct-free women underwent exercise testing and coronary angiography. Significant coronary artery disease was present in 41% of the patients. In this first group, maximal exercise variables were submitted to a stepwise logistic analysis. Work load, heart rate, and ST60X were selected to build a diagnostic model. The model was tested in a second group of 115 catheterized women (significant coronary artery disease in 47%) and of 76 volunteers. We compared the present model with conventional analysis of the exercise electrocardiogram, with ST changes adjusted for heart rate, and with a previously described analysis. In both groups, sensitivity was better with the present model (66% and 70%) than by conventional (68% and 59%) and by the previously described analysis (57% and 44%) without a loss of specificity (85% and 93%). Receiver-operator characteristic curves showed also a better diagnostic accuracy with the present model. CONCLUSIONS: In women, logistic analysis of exercise variables improves the diagnostic value of exercise testing. It yields a significantly better sensitivity without a loss of specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert et al. (1991) conducted an observational in coronary artery disease (n=326). Logistic discriminant analysis of exercise variables vs. Conventional analysis of the exercise electrocardiogram was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for coronary artery disease. Logistic analysis of exercise variables improved diagnostic sensitivity for coronary artery disease in women (66% and 70% in two groups) without a loss of specificity (85% and 93%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: