Key result
Cardiac magnetic resonance provides valuable information on mechanical dyssynchrony, myocardial scar burden, and optimal LV lead positioning to improve clinical outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Why the study?
A significant percentage of heart failure patients do not experience clinical improvement after CRT implantation, making better identification of potential responders an important factor.
Does cardiac magnetic resonance improve patient selection and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Does cardiac magnetic resonance improve patient selection and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cardiac magnetic resonance can improve patient selection and outcomes for cardiac resynchronization therapy by assessing mechanical dyssynchrony, scar burden, and guiding LV lead placement.
Patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and signs of myocardial dyssynchrony have a poor prognosis. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is a proven therapeutic modality that reduces symptoms of heart failure as well as morbidity and mortality in these patients. Better identification of patients who could benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy is an important factor because a significant percentage of patients do not experience clinical improvement after CRT implantation. Cardiac magnetic resonance is a useful, non-invasive, sophisticated diagnostic tool that can provide useful information on the aetiology of heart failure and the severity of mechanical dyssynchrony of the left ventricle. It helps evaluate the myocardial scar burden, which can predict a possible unsatisfactory response to therapy and helps improve clinical outcomes by enabling optimal positioning of the LV lead. Cardiac magnetic resonance in patient follow up after CRT implantation is proven to have significant clinical value. Conclusion: Cardiac magnetic resonance is a non-invasive imaging modality that can provide better identification of the patients who could respond well to cardiac resynchronization therapy. By providing valuable information about the severity of mechanical dyssynchrony, the myocardial scar burden and optimal positioning of the LV lead, it is useful in improving clinical outcomes after CRT implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zdravković et al. (2020) conducted a review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and mechanical dyssynchrony. Cardiac magnetic resonance was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance provides valuable information on mechanical dyssynchrony, myocardial scar burden, and optimal LV lead positioning to improve clinical outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: