Key result
Abdominal aortic aneurysms are linked to ~29% greater perivascular adipose tissue density differences, indicating local inflammation.
Why the study?
Perivascular adipose tissue alterations on CT needed investigation as a potential marker of inflammation in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Does AI-assisted CT assessment of perivascular adipose tissue detect density alterations in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=200)
No
Does AI-assisted CT assessment of perivascular adipose tissue detect density alterations in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms compared to controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.9% vs 6.9%
p-value: p=0.006
CT-based assessment of perivascular adipose tissue reveals density alterations in abdominal aortic aneurysms, highlighting its potential as a non-invasive marker for vascular inflammation.
May support CT as non-invasive AAA inflammation marker; leaves open prospective validation for risk prediction.
This retrospective study investigates perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) alterations in CT as a marker of inflammation in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). 100 abdominal CT scans of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and 100 age and sex matched controls without underlying aortic disease were included. Artificial Intelligence (AI) assisted segmentation of the aorta and the surrounding adipose tissue was performed. Adipose tissue density was measured in Hounsfield units (HU) close (2-5mm, HU close ) and distant (10-12mm, HU distant ) to the aortic wall. To investigate alterations in adipose tissue density close to the aorta (HU close ) as a potential marker of inflammation, we calculated the difference HU Δ = HU close -HU distant and the fat attenuation ratio HU ratio = HU close /HU distant as normalized attenuation measures. These two markers were compared i) inter-individually between AAA patients and controls and ii) intra-individually between the aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal segments in AAA patients. Since most AAAs are generally observed infrarenal, the aneurysmal section of the AAA patients was compared with the infrarenal section of the aorta of the control patients. In inter-individual comparisons, higher HU Δ and a lower HU ratio were observed (aneurysmal: 8.9 ± 5.1 HU vs. control: 6.9 ± 4.8 HU, p-value = 0.006; aneurysmal: 89.8 ± 5.7% vs. control: 92.1 ± 5.5% p-value = 0.004). In intra-individual comparisons, higher HU Δ and lower HU ratio were observed (aneurysmal: 8.9 ± 5.1 HU vs. non-aneurysmal: 5.5 ± 4.1 HU, p-value < 0.001; aneurysmal: 89.8 ± 5.7% vs. non-aneurysmal 93.3 ± 4.9%, p-value < 0.001). The results indicate PVAT density alterations in AAA patients. This motivates further research to establish non-invasive imaging markers for vascular and perivascular inflammation in AAA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ginzburg et al. (2024) conducted a case-control in Abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=200). Abdominal aortic aneurysm vs. Matched controls without underlying aortic disease was evaluated on Difference in perivascular adipose tissue density (HUΔ = HUclose - HUdistant) (p=0.006). Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms exhibited significantly higher perivascular adipose tissue density differences compared to controls (8.9 vs 6.9 HU, p=0.006), indicating local inflammation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: