Key result
Acetazolamide reduces isometric force by ~37% and lowers EMG amplitude during Achilles tendon-tap versus placebo.
Why the study?
Does acetazolamide alter peripheral afferent transmission in healthy humans?
RCT
Does acetazolamide alter peripheral afferent transmission in healthy humans?
Acetazolamide inhibits the tendon-tap reflex and associated isometric force, likely due to impairment of synaptic integrity between Ia fibers and alpha motor neurons.
May impair tendon reflexes during clinical exams; hypothesis-generating for Ia-afferent effects and should not change practice.
Carbonic anhydrase has been localized in skeletal muscle and nerve, thus, inhibition with acetazolamide (ACZ) may alter nerve and/or muscle function in healthy humans. ACZ (3 oral doses 14, 8, and 2 h prior to testing) reduced isometric force (37%) and peak to peak electromyographic (EMG) amplitude (1.38 mV to 0.83 mV), while increasing EMG latency associated with a unilateral Achilles tendon-tap. Reflex recovery profiles, following a contralateral conditioning tap, were similar in both placebo and ACZ experiments. ACZ led to significant changes in Hmax/Mmax ratio (52.19/14.42 to 45.73/15.65) and H-reflex latency (34.18 +/- 2.54 ms to 35.24 +/- 2.74 ms). Motor nerve conduction velocity and maximal voluntary isometric torque (knee extensors) were unaltered by ACZ. These data suggest that inhibition of the tendon-tap reflex and associated isometric force, following ACZ, is related to impairment of synaptic integrity between la fibers of the muscle spindle and the alpha motor neuron and not impairment of the muscle spindle or force-generating capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brechue et al. (1997) conducted an RCT in Healthy. Acetazolamide vs. Placebo was evaluated on Isometric force and peak to peak electromyographic (EMG) amplitude. Acetazolamide reduced isometric force by 37% and peak to peak electromyographic amplitude (1.38 mV to 0.83 mV) associated with a unilateral Achilles tendon-tap.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: