Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation: experience from the Kiel study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Edwards SAPIEN-XT or SAPIEN-3 transcatheter heart valves via transaortic (TAo) access. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing TAo-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were included in this observational registry (November 2012-December 2014). Periprocedural and post-procedural outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of these 100 patients, 1 received a Medtronic CoreValve. Therefore, this patient was subsequently removed from the analysis. Ninety-nine consecutive TAo-TAVI patients received a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (Sapien). The SAPIEN-XT valve was implanted in 53 patients and the SAPIEN-3 valve in 46 patients. Fluoroscopy time was shorter in the SAPIEN-3 cases (5.6 ± 2.5 vs 8.1 ± 5.1 min, SAPIEN-XT; P = 0.004), with fewer patients requiring dilatation after the operation (20.5% SAPIEN-3 vs 64.2% SAPIEN-XT; P < 0.0001). There were no other significant differences in procedural characteristics between the two valves. All-cause 30-day mortality was 5.1% overall, with comparable outcomes for the two valves (5.7 and 4.4% for SAPIEN-XT and SAPIEN-3 valves, respectively; OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.21-8.27; P = 1.0). New atrial fibrillation (13.1%) and acute kidney injury (11.1%) were the most common complications during the 30 days post-procedure. The number of new pacemakers was low (6.1%), with no differences found between the two valve groups. A comparison of 100 TAo- and 42 TA-TAVI implanted in the same period demonstrated similar results in short- (P = 0.31) and long-term (P = 0.99) mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of the Edwards SAPIEN-XT or SAPIEN-3 heart valves via TAo access were demonstrated by high procedural success and low complication rates. The data indicate that this approach is a viable alternative to established access routes.