Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An expert panel was assembled to support a review of a series of recent publications using a modified Delphi format. These publications were scored based on a consideration of confidence in their methods, results, conclusions, and applicability to risk-based decision making. Mean confidence scores for the papers reviewed ranged from 53 to 74 (maximum score = 100), and key strengths and concerns were identified. This review highlights the need for transparency in meta-analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirman et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: