Key result
CHD links to higher arterial wall macrophage infiltration than DCMP despite similar perivascular fat area.
Why the study?
Does the amount of coronary perivascular fat or macrophage infiltration differ between patients with atherosclerotic coronary heart disease and dilation cardiomyopathy?
Cross-Sectional (n=96)
Single-blind
No
Does the amount of coronary perivascular fat or macrophage infiltration differ between patients with atherosclerotic coronary heart disease and dilation cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 96.4% vs 91.1%
p-value: p=n.s.
The interaction between macrophages in the arterial wall and surrounding adipose tissue may be a more important mechanism of atherogenesis than the absolute size of the perivascular fat itself.
Arterial macrophage infiltration may matter more than perivascular fat volume in CHD; leaves open mechanistic and therapeutic implications.
Interesting and stimulating data about the effect of the perivascular adipose tissue size on atherogenesis are based mainly on CT findings. We studied this topic by directly analyzing perivascular adipose tissue in explanted hearts from patients undergoing transplantation. Ninety-six consecutive patients were included, including 58 with atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD) and 38 with dilation cardiomyopathy (DCMP). The area of perivascular fat, area of the coronary artery wall, and ratio of CD68-positive macrophages within the perivascular fat and within the vascular wall were quantified by immunohistochemistry. There was no significant difference in the perivascular adipose tissue size between the two groups. Nevertheless, there was a significantly higher number of macrophages in the coronary arterial wall of CHD patients. In addition, we found a close relationship between the ratio of macrophages in the arterial wall and adjacent perivascular adipose tissue in the CHD group, but not in the DCMP group. According to our data interaction between macrophages in the arterial wall and macrophages in surrounding adipose tissue could be more important mechanism of atherogenesis than the size of this tissue itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lesná et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease vs Dilatation cardiomyopathy (n=96). Coronary heart disease vs. Dilatation cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Cross-sectional area of perivascular adipose tissue in the proximal part of the coronary artery (mm2) (p=n.s.). Coronary perivascular fat area did not differ between coronary heart disease and dilatation cardiomyopathy patients, but arterial wall macrophage infiltration was significantly higher in the CHD group.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: