Key result
BP-SES shows comparable TLF to DP-EES across all SYNTAX scores.
Why the study?
Do biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents compared to durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents improve clinical outcomes across different SYNTAX score categories in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=2,041)
randomly allocated
Do biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents compared to durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents improve clinical outcomes across different SYNTAX score categories in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Higher SYNTAX scores are associated with worse clinical outcomes after PCI, but biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents perform comparably across all levels of angiographic complexity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians may select BP-SES or DP-EES irrespective of SYNTAX score; confirms the score's prognostic value in contemporary PCI.
AIMS: We sought to assess the performance of drug-eluting stents combining an ultrathin cobalt-chromium platform with a biodegradable polymer across categories of increasing SYNTAX score (SS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients included in the BIOSCIENCE trial and randomly allocated to treatment with biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) or durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) were categorised according to SS tertiles (low <8, medium 8-15, high >15). The primary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF), was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation. The patient-oriented endpoint (POCE) included death, myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularisation. The SS was available in 2,041 out of 2,119 patients (96.3%). At two-year follow-up, patients with an SS >15 experienced higher rates of both TLF and POCE as compared to patients with medium and low SS (14.5% vs. 8.1% and vs. 5.9%, p<0.001; 22.7% vs. 14.9% and vs. 12.4%; p<0.001), respectively. Comparable rates of the composite endpoints were documented for both stent types in each category of SS. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing lesion complexity as assessed by SS was associated with higher rates of TLF and POCE in a contemporary PCI population with minimal exclusion criteria. BP-SES and DP-EES showed comparable performance across the entire spectrum of CAD severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franzone et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (n=2,041). Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) vs. Durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) was evaluated on Target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation. High SYNTAX score (>15) was associated with higher target lesion failure than low score (<8) (14.5% vs 5.9%, p<0.001), while BP-SES and DP-EES showed comparable performance across all scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: