Key result
Shear wave elastography reveals ~100% higher renal elasticity in CKD patients, correlating strongly with eGFR.
Why the study?
There was an evidence gap regarding the application of shear wave elastography technology to the dynamic evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease.
Does ultrasonic shear wave elastography accurately quantify renal elasticity alterations and stage disease in patients with chronic kidney disease compared to healthy adults?
Case-Control (n=95)
Does ultrasonic shear wave elastography accurately quantify renal elasticity alterations and stage disease in patients with chronic kidney disease compared to healthy adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 24.7% vs 12.3%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Ultrasonic shear wave elastography provides a reliable, non-invasive method for quantifying renal elasticity and accurately staging chronic kidney disease.
OBJECTIVE: This study is the first attempt to apply shear wave elastography (SWE) technology to the dynamic evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), aiming to fill the evidence gap of this technology in this clinical scenario. METHODS: This case-control study enrolled 75 biopsy-confirmed CKD patients (observation group) and 20 healthy adults (control group). Renal morphological parameters (length, diameter, parenchymal thickness) were obtained via two-dimensional ultrasonography. Under SWE mode, three consecutive measurements of Young's modulus (Emean, Emax, Emin) were performed at the right renal lower pole cortex, with the mean value used for analysis. RESULTS: Key findings included: Significant reductions in renal length (9.8±1.2 cm vs. 11.5±0.9 cm, p < 0.05) and parenchymal thickness (1.2±0.3 cm vs. 1.8±0.2 cm, p < 0.05) in CKD patients versus controls; Elevated elasticity parameters in CKD group (Emean: 24.7±5.1 kPa vs. 12.3±2.8 kPa; Emax: 38.9±7.2 kPa vs. 16.1±3.5 kPa; Emin: 15.2±3.8 kPa vs. 8.7±1.9 kPa; all p < 0.05); Stage-dependent variations: CKD Stage 3-4 exhibited 32% higher Emean than Stage 1-2 (p < 0.01); Diagnostic performance metrics: Emax showed superior specificity (92.1% vs. 85.6% for Emean, 78.3% for Emin), Emin demonstrated higher sensitivity (89.4% vs. 82.7% for Emax, 79.5% for Emean); Strong correlations between SWE parameters and disease progression (r = 0.82 for Emax vs. eGFR, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: SWE provides a reliable non-invasive approach for quantifying renal elasticity alterations, demonstrating excellent diagnostic accuracy in CKD staging. The complementary performance of Emax (specificity) and Emin (sensitivity) suggests their combined use could optimize clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Chronic kidney disease (n=95). Shear wave elastography (SWE) vs. Healthy adults was evaluated on Mean Young's modulus (Emean) (p=< 0.05). Shear wave elastography revealed significantly elevated renal elasticity in CKD patients compared to healthy controls (Emean: 24.7 vs 12.3 kPa, p < 0.05), correlating strongly with eGFR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: