Key result
Higher composite dietary antioxidant index linked to better cardiovascular health.
Why the study?
The effect of dietary antioxidant capacity on health has garnered attention, but unequivocal evidence regarding its benefits on cardiovascular diseases remains lacking.
Does a higher composite dietary antioxidant index improve cardiovascular health?
Cross-Sectional
Yes
Does a higher composite dietary antioxidant index improve cardiovascular health?
Odds Ratio: 0.19 (95% CI 0.14–0.25)
Higher dietary antioxidant intake is associated with better cardiovascular health scores, with a stronger positive correlation observed among individuals with lower socioeconomic status.
Supports antioxidant-rich diets for CV health in observational data; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective trials to confirm causality.
Background: The effect of dietary antioxidant capacity on health has attracted increasing attention, but unequivocal evidence for its benefits on cardiovascular diseases is still lacking. Objectives: Our aim was to assess the association between composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) and Life’s Essential 8 (LE8), an evaluation indicator of cardiovascular health (CVH), in two large cohorts. Methods: The cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2018 and Community Cohort Study on Specialized Nervous System Diseases (CCSNSD) 2018. The relationship between CDAI and CVH was studied by multinomial logistic regression, restricted cubic spline, subgroup and sensitivity analysis. Results: After adjusting for all potential confounding factors, it suggested that higher CDAI was positively associated with higher CVH (NHANES: OR Q4 vs. Q1 = 0.19, 95 % CI: 0.14–0.25; CCSNSD: OR Q4 vs. Q1 = 0.03, 95 % CI: 0.03–0.04). And a nonlinear dose–response relationship between CDAI and CVH was observed in two large cohorts. The robustness of the results was further demonstrated by sensitivity analysis. Among them, Mendelian randomization analysis showed that higher Vitamin C and Vitamin E intakes were causally associated with a lower risk of CVD. Moreover, there was a stronger positive correlation between the CDAI and CVH among individuals with lower socioeconomic status in both cohorts. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated the potential benefit of dietary antioxidant intake in improving CVH. Besides, the relationship between CDAI and CVH may be influenced by income levels, highlighting the need for targeted interventions in populations with low income to increase CVH levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular health. Composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) vs. Lowest quartile of CDAI (Q1) was evaluated on Cardiovascular health (CVH) evaluated by Life's Essential 8 (LE8) (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14-0.25). Higher composite dietary antioxidant index was positively associated with higher cardiovascular health across two large cohorts (NHANES OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14-0.25; CCSNSD OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.03-0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: