Key result
Propafenone is associated with a ~72% reduction in average PVCs among children with idiopathic arrhythmias.
Why the study?
Although antiarrhythmic therapy is sometimes required for pediatric premature ventricular contractions, limited data exist regarding the effectiveness of such therapy specifically in children.
Does propafenone reduce premature ventricular contractions in children with idiopathic PVCs?
Observational (n=33)
No
Does propafenone reduce premature ventricular contractions in children with idiopathic PVCs?
Propafenone is an effective and generally safe antiarrhythmic option for reducing idiopathic premature ventricular contractions in children, including those unresponsive to beta-blockers.
Propafenone may reduce idiopathic PVCs in children; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials before practice change.
Background. Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are a common heart rhythm disorder in children, often following a benign course. However, in rare cases, antiarrhythmic therapy is required for managing this arrhythmia. Limited data is available regarding the effectiveness of such therapy specifically in children. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of propafenone administration in children with idiopathic PVCs. Methods. The study enrolled 33 children aged 11.1 ± 4.8 years (29 days — 17 years) with idiopathic PVCs. Propafenone dose was titrated from initial (5–7 mg/kg/day) to effective (no more than 15 mg/kg/day) dose under clinical and electrocardiographic control to monitor for proarrhythmias and other side effects. An increase in PQ interval duration and a widening of the QRS complex no more than 25% compared to baseline was considered acceptable. Results. The incidence of PVCs before propafenone administration was 36.3 ± 10.1 (22.0–60.6) thousands/day or 33.2 ± 8.4% (20.5–50.0). Complex forms of PVCs were observed in 25 (75.8%) children: 25 (75.8%) had frequent paired PVCs, 6 (18.2%) had polymorphic PVCs, 20 (60.6%) had short runs of ventricular tachycardia (VT), and 19 (27.6%) had a combination of various forms of PVCs. The starting dose of propafenone was 5.6 ± 2.2 mg/kg/day with subsequent increases to 10 ± 0.8 mg/kg/day. Propafenone was employed as the initial therapy in 23 (69.7%) children and as a second line therapy in 10 (30.3%) children, following the ineffectiveness or adverse effects of beta-adrenoblockers. The duration of propafenone therapy was 95.8 ± 62.8 days. Propafenone was effective in 25 (75.8%) children. The average reduction in the number of PVCs during therapy was 71.7 ± 32.6% (13.0–100.0) during therapy. One (3%) child developed proarrhythmia — sustained VT and 1 (3%) child had gastrointestinal side effects. Conclusion. Propafenone is an effective antiarrhythmic drug in children with idiopathic PVCs, including patients with poor response to beta-adrenoblockers. Arrhythmogenic and extracardiac side effects are possible during propafenone therapy, which require clinical and electrocardiographic observation in the process of selecting an effective dose of the drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alekseeva et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (n=33). Propafenone was evaluated on Treatment efficacy (>50% reduction in PVCs, >90% reduction in paired PVCs, and absence of ventricular tachycardia runs). Propafenone was effective in 75.8% of children with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions, reducing the average number of PVCs by 71.7% during therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: