Key result
Switching to candesartan and HCTZ lowers urinary angiotensinogen ~46% versus ARB monotherapy in diabetic nephropathy.
Why the study?
Does switching to a fixed combination of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide reduce urinary angiotensinogen and proteinuria in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy?
Does switching to a fixed combination of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide reduce urinary angiotensinogen and proteinuria in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 208% vs 386%
p-value: p=<0.001
Intensive antihypertensive treatment with an ARB combined with HCTZ reduces urinary angiotensinogen and proteinuria in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy, suggesting its utility as a surrogate biomarker for renal RAS activity.
May support urinary angiotensinogen as renal RAS biomarker in diabetic nephropathy; leaves open whether combination therapy improves outcomes over ARB monotherapy.
Purpose: Local activation of rennin-angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). One of the RAS components, angiotensinogen (AGT) has been known to be a potential surrogate biomarker for the renal RAS activity. Measuring the daily urinary excretion of AGT (U-AGT), the present study addressed whether the intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering with combined antihypertensive agents could improve such an abnormality in diabetic CKD patients. Methods: Uncontrolled hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate nephropathy previously receiving angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in an optimal dose alone were recruited for a better blood pressure (BP) control. Urinary specimens were subjected to a quantitative measurement of a daily urinary protein (U-prot) and U-AGT. After the baseline measurement, intensive antihypertensive therapy was attempted by switching the ARB dose to a fixed combination formula of candesartan 8 mg plus hydrochlorthiazide (HCTZ) 6.25 mg and the patients were followed up for 24 weeks. Comparison of parameters was then made between the values at the baseline and the end of the study. Results: At baseline, there was a significant positive correlation between U-AGT and U-prot, and between U-AGT and serum creatinine (Cr) concentration. In addition, U-AGT was inversely correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR). Switching the antihypertensive regime from ARB alone to the combined ARB/HCTZ significantly reduced BP, U-AGT and U-prot. The magnitude of the reduction in U-prot was positively correlated with that in U-AGT. A stepwise regression analysis showed that HbA1c, e-GFR and the reduction in U-prot in response to the intensive antihypertensive therapy were positively correlated with the reduction in U-AGT. Conclusion: U-AGT is increased and positively correlated with U-prot in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Intensive antihypertensive treatment with ARB combined with HCTZ reduces both U-AGT and U-prot, presumably via an amelioration of an accelerated renal RAS activity. These data also suggest that U-AGT can be used as a potential therapeutic surrogate biomarker for the activated renal RAS in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuriyama et al. (2013) studied Type 2 diabetic nephropathy with uncontrolled hypertension (n=35). Candesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide vs. Baseline (ARB monotherapy) was evaluated on Daily urinary excretion of angiotensinogen (U-AGT) in μg/day (p=<0.001). Switching from ARB monotherapy to a fixed combination of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide significantly reduced daily urinary angiotensinogen from 386 to 208 μg/day (p<0.001) in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: