Key result
Amlodipine reduces LVMI by ~35 gm/m2 and lowers ADMA vs bisoprolol in hypertensive hemodialysis patients.
Why the study?
Left ventricular hypertrophy and ADMA are surrogate markers of CVD in dialysis patients, but the comparative effects of calcium channel blocker-based versus beta-blocker-based antihypertensive regimens on these markers were unclear.
Does amlodipine reduce LVMI and ADMA levels in hypertensive patients on maintenance hemodialysis compared to bisoprolol?
RCT (n=46)
open-label
randomly assigned
No
Does amlodipine reduce LVMI and ADMA levels in hypertensive patients on maintenance hemodialysis compared to bisoprolol?
Absolute Event Rate: 35% vs 9.8%
p-value: p=.017
Amlodipine is superior to bisoprolol in reducing left ventricular mass index and ADMA levels in hypertensive hemodialysis patients without prior CVD, despite similar blood pressure reductions.
Supports preferring amlodipine over bisoprolol to regress LVH in hypertensive HD patients; extends comparative efficacy data in ESRD.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) are surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the dialysis population. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a calcium channel blocker-based antihypertensive regimen compared to a beta-blocker-based antihypertensive regimen on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and ADMA levels in hypertensive patients on hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: This was a parallel-design, open-label, single-center randomized controlled trial on 46 hypertensive patients on maintenance HD, with no history of CVD. Patients were randomly assigned to receive amlodipine 10 mg/d (n = 23) or bisoprolol 10 mg/d (n = 23). Office-based blood pressure (BP) was targeted to ≤ 140/ 90 mm Hg. The outcome was the change in LVMI and ADMA from baseline to 6 months. RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics did not vary between groups. After 6 months of treatment, amlodipine-based therapy induced a greater reduction in LVMI from baseline than bisoprolol-based treatment (35 ± 34.2 vs 9.8 ± 35.9 gm/m2; P = .017). A similar reduction in the mean BP occurred with treatment in both groups. ADMA concentration decreased significantly from baseline in the amlodipine group (0.75 ± 0.73 to 0.65 ± 0.67 nmol/mL; P = .001), but increased nonsignificantly in the bisoprolol group (0.64 ± 0.61 to 0.78 ± 0.64 nmol/mL; P = .052). CONCLUSION: This study showed that compared to a bisoprolol-based regimen, an amlodipine-based antihypertensive regimen resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LVMI and ADMA levels from baseline in hypertensive patients on HD despite similar BP reduction in both groups. These findings support the re-evaluation of amlodipine as a potential first-line antihypertensive treatment in patients on HD without previous CVD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04085562, registered September 2019.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted an RCT in hypertensive patients on maintenance hemodialysis (n=46). amlodipine vs. bisoprolol 10 mg/d was evaluated on change in LVMI and ADMA from baseline to 6 months (p=.017). Amlodipine induced a significantly greater reduction in left ventricular mass index (35 vs 9.8 gm/m2; P=0.017) and ADMA levels compared to bisoprolol in hypertensive hemodialysis patients at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: