Key result
GP recognition of depression and anxiety in HF will be evaluated for 12-month QoL associations.
Why the study?
Does the recognition of depression and anxiety by general practitioners improve quality of life and prognosis in primary care patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=3,950)
Yes
Does the recognition of depression and anxiety by general practitioners improve quality of life and prognosis in primary care patients with heart failure?
This study protocol outlines a prospective observational study to evaluate the impact of general practitioner recognition of depression and anxiety on quality of life and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients.
GP awareness of depression/anxiety in HF shows no QoL benefit; leaves open whether routine screening improves prognosis in primary care.
BACKGROUND: International disease management guidelines recommend the regular assessment of depression and anxiety in heart failure patients. Currently there is little data on the effect of screening for depression and anxiety on the quality of life and the prognosis of heart failure (HF). We will investigate the association between the recognition of current depression/anxiety by the general practitioner (GP) and the quality of life and the patients' prognosis. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicenter, prospective, observational study 3,950 patients with HF are recruited by general practices in Germany. The patients fill out questionnaires at baseline and 12-month follow-up. At baseline the GPs are interviewed regarding the somatic and psychological comorbidities of their patients. During the follow-up assessment, data on hospitalization and mortality are provided by the general practice. Based on baseline data, the patients are allocated into three observation groups: HF patients with depression and/or anxiety recognized by their GP (P+/+), those with depression and/or anxiety not recognized (P+/-) and patients without depression and/or anxiety (P-/-). We will perform multivariate regression models to investigate the influence of the recognition of depression and/or anxiety on quality of life at 12 month follow-up, as well as its influences on the prognosis (hospital admission, mortality). DISCUSSION: We will display the frequency of GP-acknowledged depression and anxiety and the frequency of installed therapeutic strategies. We will also describe the frequency of depression and anxiety missed by the GP and the resulting treatment gap. Effects of correctly acknowledged and missed depression/anxiety on outcome, also in comparison to the outcome of subjects without depression/anxiety will be addressed. In case results suggest a treatment gap of depression/anxiety in patients with HF, the results of this study will provide methodological advice for the efficient planning of further interventional research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eisele et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=3,950). Recognition of depression and/or anxiety by the general practitioner vs. Unrecognized depression/anxiety or no depression/anxiety was evaluated on Quality of life after 12-months of follow-up. General practitioner recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care patients with heart failure will be evaluated for its association with 12-month quality of life in this planned observational study.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: