Key result
Dexmedetomidine blunts post-intubation heart rate increases by ~6 bpm versus esmolol.
Why the study?
Does dexmedetomidine compared to esmolol improve the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in adults undergoing elective surgery?
RCT (n=60)
Double-blind
Lottery method
No
Does dexmedetomidine compared to esmolol improve the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in adults undergoing elective surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 83.4% vs 89.86%
p-value: p=0.011
Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg provides more effective attenuation of the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation compared to esmolol 1 mg/kg.
Favors dexmedetomidine over esmolol for blunting intubation tachycardia in elective surgery; extends direct RCT comparisons of perioperative hemodynamic agents.
BACKGROUNDLaryngoscopy and tracheal intubation manifests as transient, but distinct tachycardia and hypertension due to exaggerated sympathoadrenal response.The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine (Intravenous infusion at a dose of 1 mcg/kg) and esmolol (intravenous infusion at a dose of 1 mg/kg) in blunting the haemodynamic response secondary to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.Settings and Design of Study-A prospective, randomised, double-blinded study in Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Assam. MATERIALS AND METHODSAll adult patients of both sex scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included.They were selected by lottery method to divide into two groups, Group E and Group D with 30 cases in each group.Group E received 1 mg/kg esmolol diluted to 10 mL with normal saline and Group E received dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg diluted to 10 mL with normal saline as intravenous infusion over 10 minutes before induction of anaesthesia. RESULTSResults suggested that at 1 minute after laryngoscopy and intubation, in Group E the increase in heart rate was 7.66% from the baseline which was statistically significant (p < 0.05).In Group D the increase in heart rate from baseline was 1.90%, which was statistically insignificant.At 3 minutes after intubation when both the groups were compared, the increase in mean heart rate was higher in Group E which was highly significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONBoth the drugs attenuated the pressure response.Of the two drugs administered, dexmedetomidine 1.0 μg/kg provides a consistent, reliable and effective attenuation of pressure responses when compared to esmolol 1.0 mg/kg.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choudhury et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation (n=60). Dexmedetomidine vs. Esmolol 1 mg/kg intravenous infusion over 10 minutes was evaluated on Mean heart rate at 1 minute after intubation (beats per minute) (p=0.011). Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg significantly attenuated the heart rate increase at 1 minute post-intubation compared to esmolol 1 mg/kg (83.4 vs 89.86 bpm, p=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: