Key result
Pregnancy in LVAD patients poses significant risks driven by hypercoagulability and necessitates multidisciplinary care.
Why the study?
Pregnancy in patients with left ventricular assist devices is becoming more common, but physiologic changes during pregnancy may adversely affect these patients.
Pregnancy in patients with LVADs is a high-risk scenario that requires a multidisciplinary team, including maternal-fetal medicine specialists, to manage the complex physiologic changes.
May warrant multidisciplinary teams for LVAD pregnancies; leaves open prospective studies on outcomes.
Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Although still rare, pregnancy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is becoming more common. Typical indications for the use of LVADs in reproductive-aged females include ischemic cardiomyopathy, nonischemic (familial) dilated cardiomyopathy, peripartum cardiomyopathy, and some forms of myocarditis. An LVAD drains blood through a cannula placed into the apex of the left ventricle and then returns it to the proximal aorta bypassing the aortic valve allowing hemodynamic support in parallel with the native circulation. The physiologic changes associated with pregnancy, mainly increased blood volume and hypercoagulability, may adversely affect patients with LVADs, leading to many experts recommending against pregnancy. Maternal-fetal medicine specialists should have a central role within a multidisciplinary team required to provide optimal care for this high-risk group of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pacheco et al. (2023) conducted a review in Pregnancy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Pregnancy with left ventricular assist devices was evaluated. Pregnancy in patients with left ventricular assist devices poses significant risks due to increased blood volume and hypercoagulability, necessitating multidisciplinary care.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: