Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previous studies in ovine uterine arteries have demonstrated that sex steroid hormones upregulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 expression and downregulate the protein kinase C signaling pathway, resulting in the attenuated myogenic tone in pregnancy. The present study tested the hypothesis that chronic hypoxia during gestation inhibits the sex steroid-mediated adaptation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and protein kinase C signaling pathways and increases the myogenic tone of uterine arteries. Uterine arteries were isolated from nonpregnant and near-term pregnant sheep that had been maintained at sea level (≈300 m) or exposed to high-altitude (3801 m) hypoxia for 110 days. In contrast to the previous findings in normoxic animals, 17β-estradiol and progesterone failed to suppress protein kinase C-induced contractions and the pressure-induced myogenic tone in uterine arteries from hypoxic animals. Western analyses showed that the sex steroids lost their effects on extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 expression and phospho- extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 levels, as well as the activation of protein kinase C isozymes in uterine arteries of hypoxic ewes. In normoxic animals, pregnancy and the sex steroid treatments significantly increased uterine artery estrogen receptor-α and progesterone receptor B expression. Chronic hypoxia selectively downregulated estrogen receptor-α expression in uterine arteries of pregnant animals and eliminated the upregulation of estrogen receptor-α in pregnancy or by the steroid treatments observed in normoxic animals. The results demonstrate that, in the ovine uterine artery, chronic hypoxia in pregnancy inhibits the sex steroid hormone-mediated adaptation of decreased myogenic tone by downregulating estrogen receptor-α expression, providing a mechanism linking hypoxia and maladaptation of uteroplacental circulation and an increased risk of preeclampsia in pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: