Key result
A non-dipper blood pressure pattern was associated with an unfavorable inflammatory status, including a higher likelihood of elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR 1.77) compared to dippers.
Why the study?
Inflammatory status could play a role in alterations of blood pressure circadian rhythm, leading researchers to compare usual inflammatory markers between patients with and without circadian blood pressure abnormalities.
Is a non-dipper circadian blood pressure profile associated with higher levels of inflammatory markers compared to a dipper profile in adult patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=551)
No
Is a non-dipper circadian blood pressure profile associated with higher levels of inflammatory markers compared to a dipper profile in adult patients?
Odds Ratio: 1.77 (95% CI 1.23–2.55)
p-value: p=0.001
Patients with an impaired circadian blood pressure rhythm (non-dippers) have an unfavorable inflammatory status independent of blood pressure levels, which may contribute to their worse cardiovascular prognosis.
Non-dipper BP pattern associated with higher inflammatory markers independent of BP level; leaves open causality and requires prospective validation before clinical consideration.
Introduction Inflammatory status could play a role in alterations of blood pressure (BP) circadian rhythm. The aim of our study is to compare levels of usual inflammatory markers in patients with and without circadian BP abnormalities. Material and methods This is a cross-sectional design study with retrospective data analysis which included patients from an Internal Medicine Department with normal and high BP levels older than 18 years who were separated into two groups according to the circadian profile of BP (dipper and non-dipper) based on the results of 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Patients were assessed for demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors. We considered as inflammatory markers the platelet count (PTC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein, ferritin, fibrinogen, and uric acid. Results The study included 551 patients (mean age of 54 years, 47% women). The non-dipper group had a higher percentage of individuals with higher ESR (OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.23–1.55, p = 0.001), uric acid (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.04–2.16, p = 0.028) and fibrinogen (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.18–2.51, p = 0.001) and a higher percentage of patients with higher PTC (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.37–0.78, p = 0.005). These results were independent of age, waist circumference, presence of arterial hypertension, diabetes or hyperlipidemia, and use of antihypertensive drugs including renin angiotensin aldosterone system blockers. Conclusions Patients with impaired circadian BP rhythm were associated with an unfavorable inflammatory status independently of BP levels. This fact could play a role in the prognostic differences observed between dipper and non-dipper patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vázquez-Agra et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Abnormal circadian rhythm of blood pressure (n=551). Non-dipper blood pressure pattern vs. Dipper blood pressure pattern was evaluated on Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (> 10 mm/h) (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.23-2.55, p=0.001). A non-dipper blood pressure pattern was associated with an unfavorable inflammatory status, including a higher likelihood of elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR 1.77) compared to dippers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: