Key result
Low-molecular-weight heparins, particularly enoxaparin, are at least as efficacious as unfractionated heparin in preventing thromboembolic complications in surgery.
Why the study?
Do low-molecular-weight heparins (such as enoxaparin) prevent thromboembolic complications more effectively and safely than unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing surgery?
Do low-molecular-weight heparins (such as enoxaparin) prevent thromboembolic complications more effectively and safely than unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing surgery?
Low-molecular-weight heparins, particularly enoxaparin, offer an effective and potentially safer alternative to unfractionated heparin for deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis in surgical patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support enoxaparin preference in surgical VTE prophylaxis; leaves open need for updated RCTs on safety.
Prophylaxis with low-dose heparin has contributed significantly to the reduction in thromboembolic complications in surgery. Without prophylaxis, the rate of deep-vein thrombosis is about 30% in patients undergoing general surgery, rising up to 70% in orthopedic and trauma surgery. According to Collins et al. [N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1162-1172] and Clagett and Reisch [Ann Surg 1988; 208: 227-240] heparin prevented at least 60% of deep-vein thromboses. Meanwhile, various heparin fragments have become available for clinical use and the question arises whether these low-molecular-weight heparins are equal or even superior to unfractionated heparin in preventing thromboembolic complications. Because of the pharmacological heterogeneity of low-molecular-weight heparins and variations in administered doses, this question can only be partially answered by meta-analysis. However, in summary it can be said that despite the difficulties of and concerns about general assessments, single daily injections of low-molecular-weight heparin are at least as efficacious as multiple daily doses of unfractionated heparin. In particular, enoxaparin 40 mg once a day and enoxaparin 30 mg twice a day seem to be superior to unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients, and adverse drug reactions occur less frequently when this prophylaxis is used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Haas (2009) conducted a review in Venous thrombosis in surgery. Low-molecular-weight heparins (enoxaparin) vs. Unfractionated heparin was evaluated on Thromboembolic complications. Low-molecular-weight heparins, particularly enoxaparin, are at least as efficacious as unfractionated heparin in preventing thromboembolic complications in surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: