Key result
Grade 3 soft tissue sarcomas linked to ~16-fold greater lymph node metastasis risk versus Grade 1.
Why the study?
Lymph node metastases in trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma are rare and linked to worse survival, but established risk factors rely on small retrospective reviews.
Cohort (n=10,731)
Yes
High-grade and CARE histology, particularly with lymphovascular or bone invasion, identify a high-risk group of soft tissue sarcoma patients who may warrant pathologic lymph node assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support nodal assessment in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background and Objectives Lymph node metastases (LNM) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the trunk and extremity are rare but are associated with worse survival. Established risk factors for LNM in this group are based on small institutional retrospective reviews. This study identifies the risk factors associated with LNM in otherwise non-metastatic trunk/extremity STS patients using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and sought out to delineate a high-risk group that may be considered for pathologic nodal evaluation. Methods The files of 10,731 patients with STS of the trunk/extremity without distant metastasis from 2004 - 2015 were evaluated. Exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant therapy and a lack of pathologic nodal evaluation. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate variables associated with LNM. Results Of the total of 10,731 patients, 223 (2.1%) had LNM. On multivariable analysis, LNM was associated with Grade 3 tumors (odds ratio (OR) 15.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.36 - 38.04, p < 0.001) and clear cell/angiosarcoma/rhabdomyosarcoma/epithelioid (CARE) histology (OR 4.72, 95% CI 3.35 - 6.66, p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (OR 5.86, 95% CI 3.33 - 10.31, p < 0.001, and bone invasion (BI) (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.32 - 5.61, p = 0.006). Patients with Grade 3 CARE tumors (n = 402) had an 11.9% risk of LNM vs. 1.7% of adults without all these characteristics (p < 0.001). Patients with Grade 3 CARE tumors and either LVI or BI (n = 36) had a 33.3% risk of LNM. Conclusions High-grade and CARE histology are associated with LNM in STS. Adult patients with both features have an overall 11.9% risk of LNM and may be considered for pathologic LN assessment, particularly with the presence of LVI or BI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miccio et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremity (n=10,731). Grade 3 tumors vs. Grade 1 tumors was evaluated on Lymph node metastasis (OR 15.6, 95% CI 6.36-38.04, p=<0.001). Grade 3 tumors were significantly associated with an increased risk of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma compared to Grade 1 tumors (OR 15.6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: