Key result
Clear cell and angiosarcoma subtypes linked to ~14% nodal positivity, reducing 5-year overall survival.
Why the study?
Nodal positivity rates and the impact of nodal involvement on prognosis in clinically node negative extremity SCARE soft tissue sarcoma patients are not well described.
What are the rates of nodal positivity and the impact on overall survival in clinically node negative patients with extremity SCARE soft tissue sarcoma undergoing regional lymph node surgery?
Cohort (n=4,158)
Yes
What are the rates of nodal positivity and the impact on overall survival in clinically node negative patients with extremity SCARE soft tissue sarcoma undergoing regional lymph node surgery?
Odds Ratio: 6.38
p-value: p=<.001
Clinically node negative patients with clear cell and angiosarcoma have the highest rates of occult nodal positivity and should be considered for pathologic nodal evaluation.
Supports selective nodal evaluation in high-risk subtypes; leaves open survival impact of routine sampling in node-negative extremity SCARE sarcoma.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Synovial, clear cell, angiosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and epithelioid (SCARE) soft tissue sarcoma are at risk for nodal involvement, although the nodal positivity rates and impact on prognostication in clinically node negative patients are not well described. METHODS: Patients with extremity SCARE sarcoma without clinical nodal involvement undergoing surgical resection in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017) were included. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the likelihood of nodal surgery and nodal positivity. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used to assess associations of nodal status to overall survival. RESULTS: We included 4158 patients, and 669 patients (16%) underwent regional lymph node surgery (RLNS). On multivariable logistic analysis, patients with epithelioid (odds ratio [OR]: 3.77; p < .001) and clear cell (OR: 6.38; p < .001) were most likely to undergo RLNS. Forty-five patients (7%) had positive nodes. Clear cell sarcoma (14%) and angiosarcoma (13%) had the highest rates of nodal positivity. Patients with positive nodes had reduced 5-year overall survival, and the stratification was largest in clear cell and angiosarcoma. CONCLUSION: Discordance exists between selection for pathologic nodal evaluation and factors associated with nodal positivity. Clinically node negative patients with clear cell and angiosarcoma should be considered for pathologic nodal evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maduekwe et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in clinically node negative soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (n=4,158). Histologic subtype (clear cell and epithelioid) vs. Other SCARE sarcoma subtypes was evaluated on likelihood of undergoing regional lymph node surgery (RLNS) for clear cell sarcoma (OR 6.38, p=<.001). Clear cell and angiosarcoma subtypes in clinically node-negative extremity SCARE sarcoma had the highest rates of nodal positivity (14% and 13%), which reduced 5-year overall survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: