Key result
Contrast-enhanced CW Doppler estimates PAPs with ~2 mmHg error vs cardiac catheterization in trivial TR.
Why the study?
Does contrast-enhanced continuous-wave Doppler accurately estimate systolic pulmonary arterial pressure compared to cardiac catheterization in patients with trivial tricuspid regurgitation?
Cross-Sectional (n=41)
Does contrast-enhanced continuous-wave Doppler accurately estimate systolic pulmonary arterial pressure compared to cardiac catheterization in patients with trivial tricuspid regurgitation?
Contrast-enhanced continuous-wave Doppler is a useful noninvasive method for estimating systolic pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with trivial tricuspid regurgitation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support contrast-enhanced CW Doppler for systolic pulmonary arterial pressure estimation in trivial TR; leaves open prospective validation.
Noninvasive estimation of pulmonary arterial pressure is important for hemodynamic monitoring of patients with heart disease. In patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the peak velocity of TR on continuous-wave (CW) Doppler can be used to estimate the systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (PAPs) using the simplified Bernoulli equation. We evaluated a new technique of contrast-enhanced CW Doppler for calculating PAPs in patients with trivial TR. Forty-one patients without visible TR detected by color Doppler, pulsed Doppler or CW Doppler were evaluated. Age ranged from 19 to 73 (55 +/- 12) years old. Tricuspid flow signals were recorded on CW Doppler after intravenous administration of indocyanin green (ICG) or Albunex. PAPs was calculated as; PAPs = 4 x VTR2 + 10 mmHg, where VTR is the peak velocity of TR. PAPs calculated using contrast-enhanced CW Doppler was compared with PAPs measured by the following cardiac catheterization. 1) TR signals were recorded using the contrast-enhanced CW Doppler technique in 39 of 41 patients (95%) after intravenous administration of contrast agents. 2) The error of estimate of PAPs using the contrast-enhanced CW Doppler technique was -2.4 +/- 7.5 mmHg, and the percent error was -10.7 +/- 32.4% in all patients. In 20 of 39 patients (51%), the error of estimate was within +/- 5 mmHg. 3) PAPs was overestimated by 12.2 +/- 6.1 mmHg in patients with good contrast enhancement of TR signals. The contrast-enhanced CW Doppler technique is useful for estimating PAPs noninvasively in patients with trivial TR. It is better to assume the right atrial pressure as 3-5 mmHg, not 10 mmHg, in patients with good enhancement of trivial TR. Physiological TR may be enhanced by contrast agents in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tokushima et al. (1999) conducted a cross-sectional in Trivial tricuspid regurgitation (n=41). Contrast-enhanced continuous-wave Doppler vs. Cardiac catheterization was evaluated on Error of estimate of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (PAPs). Contrast-enhanced continuous-wave Doppler estimated systolic pulmonary arterial pressure with an error of -2.4 ± 7.5 mmHg compared to cardiac catheterization in patients with trivial TR.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: