Key result
S-ICD lead extraction achieves ~97% complete material removal without procedure-related complications.
Why the study?
S-ICDs were developed to limit transvenous lead complications, but no study had specifically investigated the safety and feasibility of S-ICD lead extraction procedures.
Is S-ICD lead extraction safe and effective in patients requiring lead removal?
Observational (n=32)
Yes
Is S-ICD lead extraction safe and effective in patients requiring lead removal?
S-ICD lead extraction is a highly successful and safe procedure, although mechanical sheaths may be required for leads with longer dwell times due to fibrotic adhesions.
Supports S-ICD lead extraction feasibility in experienced centers; leaves open need for prospective data on generalizability and long-term outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this multicenter study was to characterize the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) lead extraction procedures. BACKGROUND: S-ICDs have been developed to limit lead-related complications inherent to transvenous ICD devices. To date, no study has specifically investigated the safety and feasibility of S-ICD lead extraction procedures. METHODS: Patients requiring S-ICD lead extraction between February 1, 2014, and February 28, 2019, were retrospectively included in 10 centers. The primary endpoint of the study was procedural success, defined as the removal of all the lead and lead material from the subcutaneous space. Secondary endpoints included procedural complications and the need for specific extraction tools. RESULTS: S-ICD lead extraction procedures were performed in 32 patients (mean age 45.7 ± 13.8 years, 75.0% men, 65.6% in primary prevention). The median time from S-ICD lead implantation was 9.3 months (5.4 to 17.5 months). The primary endpoint, that is, complete removal of the material, was achieved in 96.9% of the patients, and only 1 procedural failure occurred (3.1%). Simple traction of the S-ICD lead was successful in 19 patients (59.4%), whereas 3 patients (9.4%) needed an additional incision and 9 patients (28.1%) required mechanical sheath to remove lead adhesions around the coil. No procedure-related complications occurred. Patients with successful simple traction extraction were implanted more recently (7.1 months [2.8 to 12.2 months] vs. 16.5 months [7.5 to 20.8 months]; p = 0.04) and had less prior history of sternotomy (2 [10.5%] vs. 5 [38.5%] patients; p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: S-ICD lead extraction is an efficient and safe procedure, but may require some specific tools like mechanical sheath, specifically when fibrotic adhesions developed around the parasternal coil.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Béhar et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Patients requiring S-ICD lead extraction (n=32). S-ICD lead extraction was evaluated on Procedural success, defined as the removal of all the lead and lead material from the subcutaneous space. Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction achieved complete material removal in 96.9% of patients, with no procedure-related complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: