Key result
Transmission electron microscopy remains essential for identifying unknown viruses, ensuring safety, and studying virus-cell interactions.
Transmission electron microscopy continues to play a crucial role in virology for identifying unknown viruses and studying high-resolution virus-cell interactions.
Supports retention of TEM capabilities in virology labs; leaves open comparative trials versus molecular diagnostics in outbreaks.
Viruses are very small and most of them can be seen only by TEM (transmission electron microscopy). TEM has therefore made a major contribution to virology, including the discovery of many viruses, the diagnosis of various viral infections and fundamental investigations of virus-host cell interactions. However, TEM has gradually been replaced by more sensitive methods, such as the PCR. In research, new imaging techniques for fluorescence light microscopy have supplanted TEM, making it possible to study live cells and dynamic interactions between viruses and the cellular machinery. Nevertheless, TEM remains essential for certain aspects of virology. It is very useful for the initial identification of unknown viral agents in particular outbreaks, and is recommended by regulatory agencies for investigation of the viral safety of biological products and/or the cells used to produce them. In research, only TEM has a resolution sufficiently high for discrimination between aggregated viral proteins and structured viral particles. Recent examples of different viral assembly models illustrate the value of TEM for improving our understanding of virus-cell interactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philippe Roingeard (2008) conducted a review in Viral infections. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was evaluated. Transmission electron microscopy remains an essential tool in virology for identifying unknown viral agents in outbreaks, ensuring viral safety of biological products, and studying virus-cell interactions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: