Key result
IVUS assessment of coronary ostia during TAVR safely defers chimney stenting in ~63% of cases.
Why the study?
In patients at high risk for coronary artery obstruction (CAO), the feasibility, safety, and capacity of post-TAVR IVUS to indicate chimney stenting needed evaluation.
Does IVUS assessment safely guide the decision for chimney stenting in patients at high risk for coronary artery obstruction following TAVR?
Observational (n=32)
Yes
Does IVUS assessment safely guide the decision for chimney stenting in patients at high risk for coronary artery obstruction following TAVR?
IVUS assessment of coronary ostia after TAVR is feasible and safe, potentially reducing unnecessary chimney stenting in high-risk patients without increasing adverse events.
BACKGROUND: In patients at high risk for coronary artery obstruction (CAO), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment of coronary ostia after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may detect signs of impending CAO. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of IVUS assessment in this context and its capacity to indicate chimney stenting. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Both native and valve-in-valve procedures presenting ≥2 radiological predefined high-risk characteristics for CAO were included. The primary endpoint was the feasibility and safety of IVUS assessment after TAVR. Secondary endpoints included the rate of chimney stenting deferral after IVUS, the description of IVUS-based features leading to chimney stenting, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. RESULTS: Among 32 enrolled patients (40 vessels), 2 experienced sudden CAO requiring urgent chimney stenting. IVUS was feasible and safe in all remaining cases (38 vessels). On the basis of IVUS, chimney was deferred in 24 of 38 cases (63%; 95% CI: 50%-78.9%). IVUS features guiding the decision to stent were the minimal cross-sectional area at the ostial-paraostial space and the distance of the displaced leaflet from the coronary ostium. After a median follow-up period of 366 days (Q1-Q3: 119-780 days), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events did not differ between patients receiving stents and those deferred (1 of 16 [6.2%] vs 1 of 16 [6.2%]; 95% CI: 0%-15.6%; P = 0.958). CONCLUSIONS: This first multicenter investigation on the IVUS use in the setting of CAO during TAVR suggests that the technique is both feasible and safe. Implementing IVUS in decision making on the need for chimney stenting may provide additional information, helping operators limit stent implantation only when really needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lunardi et al. (2025) conducted an observational in High risk for coronary artery obstruction following TAVR (n=32). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment was evaluated on Feasibility and safety of IVUS assessment after TAVR. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of coronary ostia during TAVR was feasible and safe in 100% of attempted vessels (38/38), allowing deferral of chimney stenting in 63% of cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: