Key result
Far-field QFVT pattern predicts ~130% higher odds of effective ATP versus non-QFVT patterns.
Why the study?
Does a QFVT pattern on far-field electrograms predict antitachycardia pacing effectiveness in ICD patients with fast ventricular tachycardias?
Observational (n=52)
Yes
Does a QFVT pattern on far-field electrograms predict antitachycardia pacing effectiveness in ICD patients with fast ventricular tachycardias?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The presence of a negative initial deflection (QFVT pattern) in far-field electrograms independently predicts higher antitachycardia pacing effectiveness and better tolerance in ICD patients with fast ventricular tachycardias.
INTRODUCTION: Fast ventricular tachycardias (FVT) are less likely to be terminated by antitachycardia pacing (ATP). No information is available regarding the ability of far-field electrogram (Ff-EG) morphology (Ff-EGm) in predicting the result of the subsequent ATP. Our objective is to determine the relationship between Ff-EGm and ATP efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter study we analyzed 289 FVT (cycle length [CL]: 250-320 milliseconds) occurring consecutively in 52 ICD patients with Medtronic devices (LVEF: 37 ± 6; pacing site: right ventricular apex). FVT programming was standardized, including a single ATP burst as initial therapy. The configuration of Ff-EG was HVA versus HVB. FVTs were classified in QFVT or non-QFVT according to the presence or absence of a negative initial deflection in the Ff-EG. The mean CL was 291 ± 24 milliseconds. We observed 4 Ff-EGm: QS (n = 14, 5%), QR (n = 158, 55%), R (n = 93, 32%), and RS (n = 24, 8%). The ATP effectiveness was 80% (86% in QS, 85% in QR, 74% in R, 62% in RS). The frequency of successful ATP was higher in QFVT: 86 versus 71% (P = 0.002). By logistic regression analysis, a QFVT pattern (OR = 2.3; P = 0.015) remained as an independent predictor of effective ATP. ATP was safer in QFVTs, the frequencies of shock (14% vs 29%; P = 0.002), acceleration (5.1 vs 12.3%; P = 0.02), and syncope (4.6 vs 12.3%; P = 0.01) being lower. CONCLUSIONS: Since ATP is less effective in non-QFVTs, they are less well tolerated. Therefore, the substrate of non-QFVTs may need a specific treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiménez‐Candil et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Fast ventricular tachycardias in ICD patients (n=52). QFVT pattern (negative initial deflection in far-field electrogram) vs. Non-QFVT pattern was evaluated on Effective antitachycardia pacing (ATP) (OR 2.3, p=0.015). A QFVT pattern on far-field electrograms independently predicted effective antitachycardia pacing compared to non-QFVT patterns (86% vs 71%; OR 2.3, P=0.015).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: