Key result
Atrial automatic capture verification confirms ~100% of paced beats using independent electrodes.
Why the study?
Does an atrial automatic capture verification scheme using independent pacing and sensing electrodes accurately detect atrial evoked response in pacemaker patients?
Population
27 patients (4 chronic and 23 acute implantations) undergoing pacemaker testing, mean age 65.6 years.
Comparison
Atrial automatic capture verification scheme… vs Visual inspection and comparison with surface…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Supports atrial capture verification feasibility; leaves open outcome benefits in prospective trials.
Does an atrial automatic capture verification scheme using independent pacing and sensing electrodes accurately detect atrial evoked response in pacemaker patients?
Atrial automatic capture verification by atrial evoked response detection is highly accurate and feasible using independent pacing and sensing electrodes.
Butter et al. (2001) studied Pacemaker implantation (n=27). Atrial automatic capture verification based on atrial evoked response vs. Visual inspection and surface ECG was evaluated on Correct capture verification rate. Atrial automatic capture verification based on atrial evoked response correctly verified capture in 99.4% to 99.8% of paced beats using independent pacing and sensing electrodes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: