Key result
Video-based heart rate algorithm achieves lowest processing time of ~17 ms on Jetson Nano.
Why the study?
Monitoring a driver's heart rate non-restrictively using remote photoplethysmography can prevent undesirable outcomes, but determining the processing time of algorithm blocks across embedded architectures is needed to optimize performance.
The study evaluates the processing time of an rPPG algorithm for heart rate estimation across different embedded architectures to optimize performance for driver monitoring.
Monitoring a driver’s heart rate is an important determinant to his health condition. The monitoring system must be accurate and non restrictive to the user’s actions. Estimating the driver’s change in his usual heart beat pattern can prevent undesirable outcomes. Several methods exist to estimate heart rate without any contact. In this paper, we are focusing on a method that uses remote photoplethysmography (rPPG). rPPG is a technique where heart rate is extracted from a PPG signal. The signal is extracted from the changes in blood flow that corresponds to the color variations recorded through an RGB camera. In this work, a different study that was based on an existing algorithm is presented to determine its processing time. The algorithm we proposed was divided into different global blocks and each block into different functional blocks (FBs). Though evaluating all the blocks’ processing time, it was possible to determine the most time consuming functional blocks. The results are implemented on different architectures: Desktop, Odroid XU4 and Jetson Nano to provide a higher performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boussaki et al. (2023) studied Heart rate monitoring. Video-based Heart Rate Estimation Algorithm vs. Desktop, Odroid XU4, Jetson Nano was evaluated on Processing time. The proposed video-based heart rate estimation algorithm achieved the lowest global processing time of 16.76 ms on the Jetson Nano architecture compared to Desktop and Odroid XU4.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: