Key result
Apamin reduces phase singularities ~36% and lowers VF vulnerability in failing rabbit hearts.
Why the study?
Does apamin infusion alter the mechanism and vulnerability of ventricular fibrillation in pacing-induced failing rabbit hearts?
Does apamin infusion alter the mechanism and vulnerability of ventricular fibrillation in pacing-induced failing rabbit hearts?
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 17.2%
p-value: p=0.009
Apamin-sensitive potassium currents influence the mechanism of ventricular fibrillation in failing hearts, and blocking them with apamin reduces VF vulnerability.
Apamin-sensitive currents may modulate VF in heart failure; hypothesis-generating and requires human validation before any clinical consideration.
Background— Ventricular fibrillation (VF) during heart failure is characterized by stable reentrant spiral waves (rotors). Apamin-sensitive small-conductance calcium-activated potassium currents ( I KAS ) are heterogeneously upregulated in failing hearts. We hypothesized that I KAS influences the location and stability of rotors during VF. Methods and Results— Optical mapping was performed on 9 rabbit hearts with pacing-induced heart failure. The epicardial right ventricular and left ventricular surfaces were simultaneously mapped in a Langendorff preparation. At baseline and after apamin (100 nmol/L) infusion, the action potential duration (APD 80 ) was determined, and VF was induced. Areas with a >50% increase in the maximum action potential duration (ΔAPD) after apamin infusion were considered to have a high I KAS distribution. At baseline, the distribution density of phase singularities during VF in high I KAS distribution areas was higher than in other areas (0.0035±0.0011 versus 0.0014±0.0010 phase singularities/pixel; P =0.004). In addition, high dominant frequencies also colocalized to high I KAS distribution areas (26.0 versus 17.9 Hz; P =0.003). These correlations were eliminated during VF after apamin infusion, as the number of phase singularities (17.2 versus 11.0; P =0.009) and dominant frequencies (22.1 versus 16.2 Hz; P =0.022) were all significantly decreased. In addition, reentrant spiral waves became unstable after apamin infusion, and the duration of VF decreased. Conclusions— The I KAS current influences the mechanism of VF in failing hearts as phase singularities, high dominant frequencies, and reentrant spiral waves all correlated to areas of high I KAS . Apamin eliminated this relationship and reduced VF vulnerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2017) studied Ventricular fibrillation in heart failure (n=9). Apamin vs. Baseline was evaluated on Number of phase singularities during ventricular fibrillation (p=0.009). Apamin infusion significantly decreased the number of phase singularities (11.0 vs 17.2; P=0.009) and reduced ventricular fibrillation vulnerability in failing rabbit hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: