Key result
CT-TAVI practices vary widely across UK centers, with high-volume activity at only ~14% of sites.
Why the study?
This study sought to describe variations in CT imaging performed prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (CT-TAVI) in the UK.
Cross-Sectional (n=47)
Yes
There is wide variation in CT-TAVI acquisition, reporting, and radiation dose across UK cardiac centres, with TAVI centres more frequently reporting key procedural measurements.
May warrant standardized CT-TAVI protocols to minimize variation; leaves open effects on TAVI outcomes and radiation safety.
Objective: This cross-sectional observational study sought to describe variations in CT in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (CT-TAVI) as currently performed in the UK. Methods: 408 members of the British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging were invited to complete a 27-item online CT-TAVI survey. Results: 47 responses (12% response rate) were received from 40 cardiac centres, 23 (58%) of which performed TAVI on-site (TAVI centres). Only six respondents (13%) performed high-volume activity (>200 scans per year) compared with 13 (28%) performing moderate (100-200 scans per year) and 27 (59%) performing low (0-99 scans per year) volume activity. Acquisition protocols varied (41% retrospective, 12% prospective with wide padding, 47% prospective with narrow padding), as did the phase of reporting (45% systolic, 37% diastolic, 11% both, 6% unreported). Median dose length product was 675 mGy.cm (IQR 477-954 mGy.cm). Compared with non-TAVI centres, TAVI centres were more likely to report minimum iliofemoral luminal diameter (n=25, 96% vs n=7, 58%, p=0.003) and optimal tube angulation for intervention (n=12, 46% vs n=1, 8%, p=0.02). Conclusions: This national survey formally describes current CT-TAVI practice in the UK. High-volume activity was only present at one in seven cardiac CT centres. There is wide variation in scan acquisition, scan reporting and radiation dose exposure in cardiac CT centres.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harries et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Severe aortic valve disease (TAVI planning) (n=47). CT-TAVI practice vs. TAVI centres vs non-TAVI centres was evaluated on Variations in CT-TAVI acquisition, reporting, and dissemination of findings. A national survey of UK cardiac centers revealed wide variation in CT-TAVI scan acquisition, reporting, and radiation dose exposure, with high-volume activity present at only one in seven centers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: