Key result
IV erythromycin cuts pyloric resistance ~50% and increases flow pulse volume in anesthetized pigs.
Why the study?
Does intravenous erythromycin reduce pyloric resistance and increase gastric emptying in anaesthetized pigs?
Does intravenous erythromycin reduce pyloric resistance and increase gastric emptying in anaesthetized pigs?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.3% vs 4.6%
Erythromycin increases gastric emptying by reducing pyloric resistance and increasing the stroke volume of flow pulses.
Erythromycin may enhance gastric motility via pyloric effects in pigs; leaves open translation to human gastric emptying.
Erythromycin increases gastric emptying but the characteristics of transpyloric flow and the contribution of pyloric resistance to the mechanisms of increased flow are unknown. Transpyloric outflow and gastroduodenal pressures were studied in eight anaesthetized pigs during intravenous infusion of erythromycin (10 mg kg-1). Erythromycin increased emptying of saline through an increased stroke volume of individual flow pulses (13.7 +/- 1.24 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.30 mL) rather than by decreasing the interval between flow pulses (3.9 +/- 0.55 vs. 3.2 +/- 0.30 pulse.min-1). This flow pattern was associated with more frequent antral contractions of larger amplitude originating from the upper part of the gastric antrum, suppression of isolated pyloric pressure waves and significant reduction of the pyloric resistance to flow (2.3 +/- 0.21 vs. 4.6 +/- 0.46 mmHg mL-1 s-1). The decreased resistance originated from a different temporal relationship between antropyloric pressure event and flow pulses that occurred almost simultaneously during erythromycin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathis (1998) studied this question. Erythromycin vs. Baseline was evaluated on Pyloric resistance to flow (mmHg mL-1 s-1). Intravenous erythromycin significantly reduced pyloric resistance to flow (2.3 vs. 4.6 mmHg mL-1 s-1) and increased stroke volume of individual flow pulses in anaesthetized pigs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: