Key result
Novel 2020 ARVD/C criteria improve sensitivity for biventricular and left-dominant forms but may reduce specificity.
Why the study?
The accumulation of new data on ARVD/C and advances in magnetic resonance imaging prompted the need to develop and analyze novel diagnostic criteria identifying biventricular and left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.
Do the novel 2020 diagnostic criteria for ARVD/C improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity compared to previous criteria?
Do the novel 2020 diagnostic criteria for ARVD/C improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity compared to previous criteria?
The 2020 ARVD/C diagnostic criteria improve sensitivity for biventricular and left-dominant forms but may reduce overall specificity, requiring further validation in large clinical cohorts.
Caution advised with 2020 ARVD/C criteria in left-dominant forms due to specificity trade-offs; leaves open need for prospective validation in large cohorts.
This article describes evolution of criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C). The novel diagnostic criteria for ARVD/C published in 2020 are analyzed in detail, among which biventricular and leftdominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy are identified for the first time. The need to develop novel criteria was fed on the accumulation of new data on ARVD/C, in particular, significant advances in magnetic resonance imaging technologies. The novel criteria retained high sensitivity and specificity in relation to traditional right ventricular disease form and became more sensitive in relation to the biventricular and left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Nevertheless, the addition of left-dominant disease forms reduces the criteria specificity in general, since left ventricle involvement with a similar clinical performance can have different etiology that goes beyond the ARVD/C, even when mutations are detected in typical genes, which is demonstrated by case reports described in the article. Like the previous two versions, the novel criteria will be fully assessed only with a large sample of patients after their introduction into the routine cardiology clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lutokhina et al. (2021) conducted a review in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C). 2020 diagnostic criteria for ARVD/C was evaluated. The novel 2020 diagnostic criteria for ARVD/C improve sensitivity for biventricular and left-dominant forms but may reduce overall specificity due to overlapping etiologies of left ventricular involvement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: