Theoretical analysis demonstrates non-zero creation at the singularity of time, indicating that existence is an inevitable consequence of nothingness.
We resolve the 3000-year-old philosophical question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" by identifying Nothingness with the singularity of Time, T⁰. We prove that Nothingness is not absence, but the eternal source of Time-Flow. Because a singularity cannot have zero creation, S(T⁰) ≠ 0. Therefore, the existence of Something is a necessary and eternal consequence of the existence of Nothing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalid Masood (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: