Key result
Enalaprilat plasma concentrations strongly correlate with blood pressure decreases following a single oral enalapril dose.
Effect estimate: r = -0.95
p-value: p=<0.001
Newly developed ELISA methods for enalapril and enalaprilat are sensitive and accurate for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic testing, demonstrating a strong correlation between enalaprilat levels and blood pressure reduction.
May aid enalapril PK-PD research; leaves open whether ELISA monitoring improves clinical dosing.
We have developed two enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods for determining enalapril and enalaprilat in plasma. In this study, 48 healthy subjects received an oral dose of either 10 or 20 mg of enalapril and plasma concentrations of enalapril and enalaprilat were determined by their specific ELISA methods. These plasma concentrations and blood pressure measurements were applied to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of both enalapril and enalaprilat. The enalapril values for the area under the curve (AUC(0)--> infinity ) were 480 +/- 216 and 832 +/- 325 ngh/mL, maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) were 310 +/- 187 and 481 +/- 185 ng/mL, and times required to reach the maximum concentration t(max) were 1.13 +/- 0.22 and 1.09 +/- 0.33 h for 10 and 20 mg doses, respectively. The enalaprilat values for AUC(0)--> infinity were 256 +/- 122 and 383 +/- 158 ngh/mL, C(max) values were 57 +/- 29 and 72.9 +/- 33.6 ng/mL and t(max) values were 4.28 +/- 1.45 and 4.05 +/- 01.22 h for 10 and 20 mg doses, respectively. The C(max) values of enalapril were approximately 10 times higher than those in the literature, which were determined by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition assays following alkaline hydrolysis, but similar to those of enalaprilat. The PD profiles revealed a significant correlation between enalaprilat concentrations in plasma and the decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressures (r = -0.95 with P < 0.001 and r = -0.95 with P < 0.001), respectively, following a single oral dose of enalapril. These ELISA methods have the advantage of being simple, accurate, sensitive, and do not depend on enalaprilat binding to ACE. Such methods can be used for analysis and kinetic testing of enalapril and enalaprilat in biological fluids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matalka et al. (2002) studied Healthy (n=48). Enalapril was evaluated on Pharmacokinetic parameters and blood pressure decrease (r = -0.95, p=<0.001). Following a single oral dose of enalapril, enalaprilat plasma concentrations significantly correlated with decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures (r = -0.95, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: