Key result
Radioisotopic assessment offers a potential method to quantify myocardial necrosis following ischemia.
Why the study?
Assessment of acute myocardial necrosis is important and challenging, and quantitative evaluation is needed to guide management and assess new therapies.
Highlights the clinical importance of quantitative assessment of myocardial necrosis, introducing radioisotopic assessment as a potential method.
Radioisotopic assessment may aid quantitative post-ischemic necrosis evaluation; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Assessment of acute myocardial necrosis in the patient with a suggestive clinical history is an important and sometimes challenging clinical problem. Immediate and long-term management often depends critically on whether or not the patient is thought to have sustained irreversible loss of myocardium. Furthermore, several promising therapeutic approaches have recently been introduced that may attenuate or eliminate permanent myocardial damage resulting from an ischemic episode.1 Evaluation of any of these therapeutic measures ultimately requires quantitative assessment of myocardial necrosis in relation to the antecedent ischemic insult. At present, myocardial necrosis is quantitated by electrocardiographic and enzymatic evidence of myocardial damage. . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myers et al. (1974) conducted a review in Acute myocardial necrosis. Radioisotopic assessment vs. Electrocardiographic and enzymatic evidence was evaluated. Radioisotopic assessment is discussed as a potential method for the quantitative evaluation of myocardial necrosis following an ischemic episode.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: