Why the study?
Does scintigraphy with 99mTc-labeled antimyosin antibodies accurately detect and quantify myocardial necrosis compared to 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging in patients with myocardial infarction?
Does scintigraphy with 99mTc-labeled antimyosin antibodies accurately detect and quantify myocardial necrosis compared to 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging in patients with myocardial infarction?
99mTc-antimyosin SPECT is highly sensitive for detecting myocardial necrosis and correlates well with other markers of infarct size, though it estimates smaller infarct sizes than 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports antimyosin SPECT for necrosis detection in MI; leaves open quantitative accuracy versus pyrophosphate.
The Fab fragments of antimyosin antibodies, labeled with 99mTc, were used in the scintigraphic examination of 30 patients with myocardial infarction. The ability to detect necrosis and determine its extent from the antimyosin scan were compared with the results of quantitative regional wall motion analysis by contrast ventriculography at 10 to 14 days and 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging. Antimyosin images recorded by planar and single photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) delineated areas of myocardial necrosis in 27 of 30 patients (90%) compared with a 91% sensitivity of pyrophosphate in 21 of 23 patients. Infarct size was determined by both antimyosin and pyrophosphate SPECT images. Results by both techniques showed a significant correlation with computer-derived hypokinetic segment length (r = .79 for both, p = .002) and peak creatine kinase (r = .9 for both, p less than .01). Although sensitivity for and correlations with markers of necrosis were similar with both techniques, infarct size by pyrophosphate SPECT was 1.7 times larger than infarct size by antimyosin SPECT (p less than .01). Certain zones in the infarct area were differentially labeled; the nature and irreversibility of injury within these zones remains to be clarified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khaw et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: