Key result
Advanced detection of subclinical target organ damage in hypertension improves CV risk evaluation and treatment.
Why the study?
Recent hypertension management guidelines emphasize assessing subclinical target organ damage to improve cardiovascular risk evaluation, treatment choice, and patient follow-up.
This review highlights the importance of assessing subclinical target organ damage using novel biomarkers and imaging techniques to better evaluate cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.
May refine hypertension risk stratification; leaves open whether routine subclinical assessment alters outcomes or practice.
Recent recommendations for the management of hypertension have stressed the importance of assessing subclinical target organ damage for the evaluation of cardiovascular risk, the choice of antihypertensive treatment and the follow-up of hypertensive patients. In addition to classic hallmarks of target organ damage (left ventricular hypertrophy, renal dysfunction, microalbuminuria), new concepts emerging from basic research and technical progresses have allowed more accurate and earlier detection of target organ damage affecting the heart (plasma BNP, coronary calcifications), the brain (silent lacunar infarcts, advanced deep white matter lesions, microbleedings) and the vasculature. The latter include markers of diffuse atherosclerosis (carotid intima-media thickness), arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity, augmentation index) and endothelial dysfunction (increased plasma levels of adhesion molecules). Current studies should help to better define the predictive power of these new phenotypes for the occurrence of overt cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases, their reversibility under antihypertensive treatment and the most adapted therapeutic strategy in at-risk patients. Furthermore, early identification of hypertensive patients more likely to develop target organ damage, will be facilitated by a more global evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors, a better use and wider acceptance of ambulatory BP measurement (including determination of nocturnal dip and blood pressure variability) and, maybe, an increased knowledge of the genetic factors underlying susceptibility to target organ damage. Lastly, randomized studies comparing different classes of antihypertensive drugs should help to test the well-known but frequently challenged concept of additional benefits of some antihypertensive drugs "beyond BP" on prevention and reversal of target organ damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Persu et al. (2004) conducted a review in Hypertension. Recent advances allow for earlier and more accurate detection of subclinical target organ damage in hypertensive patients, which is crucial for cardiovascular risk evaluation and treatment choices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: