Key result
Novel pleconaril derivatives exhibit strong anti-CVB3 activity with compound 21 achieving a 248 selectivity index.
Why the study?
There are no approved drugs for effective antiviral treatment for Coxsackieviruses type B.
Novel pleconaril analogs with O-propyl linker modifications demonstrate strong in vitro antiviral activity against Coxsackievirus B3 Nancy, providing a basis for further drug development.
These pleconaril analogs expand chemical options against Coxsackie B where none are approved; leaves open antiviral potency and safety.
Coxsackieviruses type B are one of the most common causes of mild upper respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses. At the time of writing, there are no approved drugs for effective antiviral treatment for Coxsackieviruses type B. We used the core-structure of pleconaril, a well-known antienteroviral drug candidate, for the synthesis of novel compounds with O-propyl linker modifications. Some original compounds with 4 different linker patterns, such as sulfur atom, ester, amide, and piperazine, were synthesized according to five synthetic schemes. The cytotoxicity and bioactivity of 14 target compounds towards Coxsackievirus B3 Nancy were examined. Based on the results, the values of 50% cytotoxic dose (CC50), 50% virus-inhibiting dose (IC50), and selectivity index (SI) were calculated for each compound. Several of the novel synthesized derivatives exhibited a strong anti-CVB3 activity (SI > 20 to > 200). These results open up new possibilities for synthesis of further new selective anticoxsackievirus compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Volobueva et al. (2020) studied Coxsackievirus B3 infection (in vitro). Modified O-Alkyl Linker Analogs of Pleconaril vs. Pleconaril was evaluated on 50% virus-inhibiting dose (IC50) and Selectivity Index (SI). Several novel synthesized derivatives of pleconaril exhibited strong anti-CVB3 activity, with compound 21 showing an IC50 of 6.8 µM and a selectivity index of 248.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: