Key result
Higher baseline RV global longitudinal strain predicts ~47% lower 24-month mortality per SD after CRT.
Why the study?
The prognostic role of right ventricular dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy was not well established.
Does baseline right ventricular global longitudinal strain predict mortality in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Observational (n=93)
No
Does baseline right ventricular global longitudinal strain predict mortality in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Hazard Ratio: 0.53 (95% CI 0.32–0.86)
p-value: p=0.01
Baseline right ventricular dysfunction, as assessed by global longitudinal strain, is an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
RV GLS may refine mortality risk stratification in CRT candidates; leaves open its role in selection pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction has been associated with poor prognosis in chronic heart failure (HF). However, less data is available about the role of RV dysfunction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to investigate if RV dysfunction would predict outcome in CRT. DESIGN: We enrolled prospectively ninety-three consecutive HF patients in this single center observational study. All patients underwent clinical evaluation and echocardiography before CRT and 6 months after implantation. We assessed RV geometry and function by using speckle tracking imaging and calculated strain parameters. We performed multivariable Cox regression models to test mortality at 6 months and at 24 months. RESULTS: RV dysfunction, characterized by decreased RVGLS (RV global longitudinal strain) [10.2 (7.0-12.8) vs. 19.5 (15.0-23.9) %, p<0.0001] and RVFWS (RV free wall strain) [15.6 (10.0-19.3) vs. 17.4 (10.5-22.2) %, p = 0.04], improved 6 months after CRT implantation. Increasing baseline RVGLS and RVFWS predicted survival independent of other parameters at 6 months [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.37 (0.15-0.90), p = 0.02 and HR = 0.42 (0.19-0.89), p = 0.02; per 1 standard deviation increase, respectively]. RVGLS proved to be a significant independent predictor of mortality at 24 months [HR = 0.53 (0.32-0.86), p = 0.01], and RVFWS showed a strong tendency [HR = 0.64 (0.40-1.00), p = 0.05]. The 24-month survival was significantly impaired in patients with RVGLS below 10.04% before CRT implantation [area under the curve = 0.72 (0.60-0.84), p = 0.002, log-rank p = 0.0008; HR = 5.23 (1.76-15.48), p = 0.003]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that baseline RV dysfunction is associated with poor short-term and long-term prognosis after CRT implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagy et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure (n=93). Baseline right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) vs. Per 1 standard deviation increase was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 24 months (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.86, p=0.01). Higher baseline right ventricular global longitudinal strain independently predicted lower 24-month all-cause mortality (HR 0.53 per 1 SD increase) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: