Key result
Type III-A CRISPR-Cas complexes primarily cleave nascent RNA transcripts over single-stranded DNA at the transcription bubble.
Why the study?
Whether Type III-A CRISPR-Cas Csm complexes target RNA, single-stranded DNA, or both during transcription elongation was unknown.
Type III-A CRISPR-Cas systems primarily target RNA transcripts rather than unwound ssDNA during transcription elongation, revealing similarities to eukaryotic RNA interference.
Cautions against assuming DNA cleavage in Type III CRISPR design; leaves open extension to eukaryotic RNA-targeting therapies.
Type III-A CRISPR-Cas systems are prokaryotic RNA-guided adaptive immune systems that use a protein-RNA complex, Csm, for transcription-dependent immunity against foreign DNA. Csm can cleave RNA and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), but whether it targets one or both nucleic acids during transcription elongation is unknown. Here, we show that binding of a Thermus thermophilus (T. thermophilus) Csm (TthCsm) to a nascent transcript in a transcription elongation complex (TEC) promotes tethering but not direct contact of TthCsm with RNA polymerase (RNAP). Biochemical experiments show that both TthCsm and Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) Csm (SepCsm) cleave RNA transcripts, but not ssDNA, at the transcription bubble. Taken together, these results suggest that Type III systems primarily target transcripts, instead of unwound ssDNA in TECs, for immunity against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) phages and plasmids. This reveals similarities between Csm and eukaryotic RNA interference, which also uses RNA-guided RNA targeting to silence actively transcribed genes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2019) studied this question. Type III-A CRISPR-Cas complexes (TthCsm and SepCsm) was evaluated on Nucleic acid cleavage at the transcription bubble. Type III-A CRISPR-Cas complexes (TthCsm and SepCsm) primarily target and cleave nascent RNA transcripts rather than unwound single-stranded DNA at the transcription bubble.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: