Key result
Apixaban case series provides no quantitative data for bleeding and thromboembolic events in CF-LVAD patients.
Why the study?
Maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin in CF-LVAD patients is challenging due to routine monitoring and interactions, but clinical experience with DOACs in this population is limited.
Does apixaban prevent thromboembolic events and reduce bleeding compared to historical warfarin use in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device?
Observational
No
Does apixaban prevent thromboembolic events and reduce bleeding compared to historical warfarin use in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device?
This retrospective case series explores the safety and feasibility of apixaban as an alternative to warfarin for anticoagulation in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.
Apixaban in CF-LVAD patients should not yet change practice; leaves open need for prospective trials versus warfarin.
Maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation is a significant challenge for patients requiring continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support.1 Warfarin is the current standard of care, while limitations include the need for routine international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring, complex dosing regimens, and significant drug-drug interactions.2 Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an attractive option given their lack of routine coagulation monitoring and ease of dosing. However, clinical experience in this population is limited. Therefore, this case series explored outcomes associated with DOAC use in patients with a CF-LVAD managed at a single center. This case series was approved by the quality improvement committee of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. We retrospectively evaluated patients with a CF-LVAD who were prescribed apixaban, after warfarin discontinuation, between January 2015 and December 2019. In this report, apixaban was the only DOAC used based on the discretion of the physicians and pharmacists making up the local VAD team. Data collected included patient demographics, reasons for warfarin discontinuation, bleeding and thromboembolic events, and laboratory values on the day of conversion (serum creatinine and hemoglobin levels) after the initiation of apixaban for each patient. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support definitions for major bleeding and suspected and confirmed pump thrombosis.3 Types of bleeding events after apixaban initiation were also determined. Data on historical bleeding and thromboembolic events before apixaban use were also collected. The primary outcome evaluated was the incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events during apixaban treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horn et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD). Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events during apixaban treatment. This retrospective case series evaluated apixaban for bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device, though no quantitative results were reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: