Key result
Metoprolol linked to ~41% lower MACE risk vs observation in periprocedural MI after PCI.
Why the study?
Metoprolol is recommended as a mainstay in acute myocardial infarction, but evidence supporting this regimen in periprocedural myocardial infarction is limited.
Does chronic oral sustained-release metoprolol succinate reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with periprocedural myocardial infarction following PCI?
Cohort (n=860)
Yes
Does chronic oral sustained-release metoprolol succinate reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with periprocedural myocardial infarction following PCI?
Hazard Ratio: 0.588 (95% CI 0.385–0.898)
Absolute Event Rate: 15% vs 22.1%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 7.1%
Number Needed to Treat: 14
p-value: p=0.014
In patients with periprocedural myocardial infarction after PCI, treatment with metoprolol succinate is associated with a significantly reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events over a median of 3.2 years.
Associated with lower MACE in periprocedural MI post-PCI; hypothesis-generating, requires RCTs before practice change.
Background: Metoprolol is the most used cardiac selective β-blocker and has been recommended as a mainstay drug in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the evidence supporting this regimen in periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) is limited. Methods: This study identified 860 individuals who suffered PMI following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure and median followed up for 3.2 years. Subjects were dichotomized according to whether they received chronic oral sustained-release metoprolol succinate following PMI. After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment, logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve, and Cox regression analysis were performed to estimate the effects of metoprolol on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) which composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and revascularization. Moreover, an exploratory analysis was performed according to hypertension, cardiac troponin I (cTnI) elevation, and cardiac function. A double robust adjustment was used for sensitivity analysis. Results: Among enrolled PMI subjects, 456 (53%) patients received metoprolol treatment and 404 (47%) patients received observation. After IPTW adjustment, receiving metoprolol was found to reduce the subsequent 3-year risk of MACEs by nearly 7.1% [15 vs. 22.1%, absolute risk difference (ARD) = 0.07, number needed to treat (NNT) = 14, relative risk (RR) = 0.682]. In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analyses, receiving metoprolol was related to a reduced risk of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.588, 95%CI [0.385–0.898], P = 0.014) and revascularization (HR = 0.538, 95%CI [0.326–0.89], P = 0.016). Additionally, IPTW-adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that receiving metoprolol reduced the risk of MI at the third year (odds ratio [OR] = 0.972, 95% CI [0.948–997], P = 0.029). Exploratory analysis showed that the protective effect of metoprolol was more pronounced in subgroups of hypertension and cTnI elevation ≥1,000%, and was remained in patients without cardiac dysfunction. The benefits above were consistent when double robust adjustments were performed. Conclusion: In the real-world setting, receiving metoprolol treatment following PCI-related PMI has decreased the subsequent risk of MACEs, particularly the risk of recurrent MI and revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=860). Metoprolol vs. Observation was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 0.588, 95% CI 0.385-0.898, p=0.014). Metoprolol reduced the 3-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 7.1% (HR 0.588) compared to observation in patients with periprocedural myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: