Key result
Oral and IV N-acetylprocainamide shows no effect on hemodynamics in normal subjects or cardiac patients.
Why the study?
The hemodynamic effects of N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) in patients with heart disease and normal subjects were not well characterized.
Does N-acetylprocainamide affect hemodynamic parameters in normal subjects and patients with heart disease?
Population
6 normal subjects, 6 patients with primary cardiomyopathy, and 5 patients with ventricular dysrhythmias due to cardiac diseases
Comparison
Oral NAPA at 3, 4, 5, and 6 gm/day vs intravenous NAPA infusion
Design
Case series
Follow-up
4 days oral administration or 48 hours intravenous infusion
Authors
Loading...
Suggests hemodynamic neutrality in cardiac disease; leaves open randomized trials before any practice consideration.
Does N-acetylprocainamide affect hemodynamic parameters in normal subjects and patients with heart disease?
N-acetylprocainamide appears hemodynamically safe for use in patients with reduced left ventricular performance due to cardiac disease.
Crawford et al. (1982) studied Heart disease (primary cardiomyopathy, ventricular dysrhythmias) (n=17). N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) was evaluated on Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, echocardiographic indices, pulmonary pressures, cardiac output). Oral and intravenous N-acetylprocainamide demonstrated no significant effect on heart rate, blood pressure, or other hemodynamic indices in normal subjects or patients with cardiac disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: