Why the study?
Disease profiles and access to care differ between rural and urban populations, prompting an evaluation of the association of rurality with EHR-derived disease profiles and heart failure risk.
Does rurality increase the risk of heart failure and alter disease profiles compared to urban living?
Cohort (n=242,758)
Yes
Does rurality increase the risk of heart failure and alter disease profiles compared to urban living?
Hazard Ratio: 1.2 (95% CI 1.1–1.31)
Rural populations exhibit significantly higher risks for heart failure and obesity-related diseases, alongside depleted cancer screening diagnoses, highlighting important geographic health disparities.
Rurality may confer higher HF risk after adjustment; hypothesis-generating for targeted prevention, with prospective studies needed before practice change.
Objectives: Disease profiles and access to care differ between rural and urban populations. The aim of this study is to examine the association of rurality with electronic health record-derived disease profiles and heart failure risk. Materials and Methods: Research Program. Rurality status was estimated using 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes from participant home 3-digit zip code prefixes, and participants were grouped into rural, mixed, and urban arms. We compared the disease profiles with phenome-wide association studies and the risks of heart failure between arms. Results: The final cohort included 5581 participants in the rural arm, 62 287 in the mixed arm, and 174 890 in the urban arm. Compared to the urban setting, 70 phecodes were significantly enriched in the rural arm including obesity (odds ratio [OR], 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-1.51) and related diagnoses. Cancer screening-, dermatological-, and eye care-related diagnoses were significantly depleted in the rural arm. The rural arm also showed a greater risk of heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.20, 95% CI, 1.10-1.31). Discussion and Conclusion: , we found that rural participants had significantly higher risks for obesity-related diseases and heart failure in this study. Depleted phecodes in the rural participants suggested a lack of access to cancer screening, stressing the potential importance of targeted cancer disease management in rural communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awan et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Disease profiles and heart failure risk (n=242,758). Rural setting vs. Urban setting was evaluated on Heart failure (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: