Key result
Rapid atrial pacing captures AF within a ~29 msec window, confirming an excitable gap.
Why the study?
Does right atrial pacing allow local capture and demonstrate an excitable gap in patients with lone atrial fibrillation?
Does right atrial pacing allow local capture and demonstrate an excitable gap in patients with lone atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=< 0.01
Demonstrates the presence of an excitable gap during human atrial fibrillation, indicating the feasibility of regional control of the fibrillatory process.
May support regional AF control; leaves open therapeutic pacing applications pending randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Local capture of atrial fibrillation (AF) was shown in animal experiments for a wide range of pacing rates, thus demonstrating the existence of an excitable gap. The aim of this study was to assess the existence of an excitable gap in human AF by studying the mechanism of local control and acceleration of AF over a wide range of pacing rates and by evaluating the time window of capture. METHODS AND RESULTS: Recording and stimulation of electrical activity in the right atrium during AF was performed by a monophasic action potential (MAP) contact electrode catheter in 17 patients with lone AF during electrophysiologic study. Stimulation was started at pacing intervals close to the mean AF interval, and the time window of capture was estimated by lengthening or shortening the pacing interval until capture was lost. Pacing intervals shorter than the minimum cycle length for capture were also tested. Beat-to-beat measurements of AF intervals during pacing were performed. Atrial MAP signal showed rapid irregular activity with an average AF interval of 151.3 +/- 16.1 msec and SD of 21.3 +/- 5.2 msec. Rapid pacing with a cycle length slightly shorter or longer than the mean AF interval resulted in local capture of AF. The width of time window of capture ranged from 22 to 36 msec, with a mean value of 28.8 +/- 4.9 msec. The average minimum pacing interval of stable capture was 129.2 +/- 19.5 msec, while the maximum was 158.1 +/- 18.7 msec, corresponding to 85% and 104% of mean AF cycle length, respectively. Pacing too rapidly resulted in a transient acceleration of AF, with an average shortening of fibrillation interval from 149.8 +/- 16.6 to 123.2 +/- 15.1 msec (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Local capture is feasible during AF in humans over a wide range of pacing rates, indicating the possibility of regional control of the fibrillatory process. This result demonstrates the presence of an excitable gap during AF in human atria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capucci et al. (1999) studied Lone atrial fibrillation (n=17). Rapid atrial pacing vs. Baseline atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Time window of capture and fibrillation interval (p=< 0.01). Rapid atrial pacing demonstrated local capture of atrial fibrillation with a mean time window of 28.8 msec and shortened the fibrillation interval (P<0.01), confirming an excitable gap.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: