Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper investigates the performances of a head-mounted wearable device for the breath-by-breath monitoring of respiratory frequency (fR) during exercise. The device exploits a new algorithm to estimate fRfrom the breathing-related pressure drops (ΔP) recorded at the nostrils level. Performances of the wearable device in measuring the breath-by-breath and 30-s average fRvalues were evaluated during two high-intensity cycling exercise tests performed in the laboratory. ΔP signals were collected from ten volunteers with the wearable device, and the simultaneous measurements with a reference instrument were performed for validation purposes. In addition, numerical simulations were carried out to reproduce the conditions expected in applied settings. Bland-Altman analysis, linear regression (r2), and percentage error (%E) were used for comparing the two instruments. Experimental tests demonstrate the robustness and validity of the proposed wearable device and the related algorithm to measure the breath-by-breath fR(overall %E = 4.03%) and 30-s average fR(overall %E = 2.38%) values. Biases obtained with the breath-by-breath analysis (max. -0.06 ± 6.27 breaths/min) were higher than those obtained in the 30-s window analysis (max. -0.03 ± 1.60 breaths/min). In the simulated conditions, %E increased up to 6.65%. The proposed wearable device is suitable for a wide variety of indoor applications where the fRmonitoring during exercise at reduced invasiveness is of great value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massaroni et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: