Key result
Significant FTR in AF with preserved EF is linked to ~262% higher HF and death risk.
Why the study?
Previous studies report controversial results regarding whether significant functional tricuspid regurgitation leads to worse clinical outcomes in patients with AF.
Does significant functional tricuspid regurgitation predict adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and preserved LVEF?
Cohort (n=300)
No
Does significant functional tricuspid regurgitation predict adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and preserved LVEF?
Hazard Ratio: 3.62 (95% CI 2.11–6.21)
Absolute Event Rate: 44.6% vs 11.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with atrial fibrillation and preserved LVEF, significant functional tricuspid regurgitation is a common finding that independently predicts heart failure and mortality.
Should not yet change practice; extends observational links between functional TR and adverse events in AF with preserved EF.
Background Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) can be found in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The results of previous studies are controversial about whether significant functional TR (FTR) in patients with AF leads to worse clinical outcomes. The aims of the study were to investigate the prevalence, predictors and prognosis of significant FTR in patients with AF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods The present study was a retrospective cohort study in patients with AF and preserved LVEF from May 2013 through January 2018. Significant FTR was defined as moderate to severe TR without structural abnormality of the tricuspid valve. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was defined as pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥ 50 mmHg or mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mmHg determined by echocardiography. The adverse outcomes were defined as heart failure and death from any cause within 2 years of follow up. Results A total of 300 patients with AF (mean age 68.8 ± 10.8 years, 50% male) were included in the study. Paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF were reported in 34.7 and 65.3% of patients, respectively. Mean LVEF was 65.3 ± 6.3%. PH and significant FTR were observed in 31.3 and 21.7% of patients, respectively. Patients with significant FTR were significantly older, more female gender and non-paroxysmal AF, and had higher left atrial volume index and pulmonary artery pressure than those without. A total of 26 (8.7%) patients died and heart failure occurred in 39 (13.0%) patients. There was a statistically significant difference in the adverse outcomes between patients with significant and insignificant FTR (44.6% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.010). Multivariable analysis showed that factors associated with significant FTR were female gender, presence of PH and left atrial volume index (OR = 2.61, 1.87, and 1.04, respectively). The predictors of the adverse outcomes in patients with AF were significant FTR, presence of PH and high CHA2DS2-VASc score (OR = 5.23, 2.23 and 1.60, respectively). Conclusions Significant FTR was common in patients with AF, and independently associated with adverse outcomes. Thus, comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of FTR in patients with AF and preserved LVEF is fundamental in determining the optimal management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prapan et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (n=300). Significant functional tricuspid regurgitation vs. Insignificant functional tricuspid regurgitation was evaluated on Adverse outcomes (heart failure and death from any cause) (HR 3.62, 95% CI 2.11-6.21, p=<0.001). In patients with atrial fibrillation and preserved ejection fraction, significant functional tricuspid regurgitation was independently associated with an increased risk of heart failure and death (HR 3.62).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: